Backdating and spring loading stock options


16-Oct-2020 09:02

As always, we encourage companies that have questions about the application of the accounting literature to consult with us. As noted previously, pursuant to paragraph 10(b) of Opinion 25, the measurement date for determining the compensation cost of a stock option is the first date on which both of the following are known: (1) the number of options that an individual employee is entitled to receive and (2) the option or purchase price.Thus, even if documents related to an award of options are dated as of an earlier date, the measurement date cannot occur until the date the terms of the award and its recipient are actually determined.25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (Opinion 25).

That member or committee of management determined option awards to be made to subordinates within specific parameters previously communicated by the board of directors (or compensation committee thereof) and obtained any appropriate approvals at a later date.

As such, for the purpose of determining compensation cost pursuant to Opinion 25, it is important to determine whether a company’s stock option granting practices resulted in the award of stock options with an exercise price that was lower than the market price of the underlying stock at the date on which the terms and recipients of those stock options were determined with finality.

The topics addressed in this letter largely relate to questions about whether a company’s determination of the measurement date of past stock option awards was appropriate.

In many cases, when options were awarded before (or in the absence of) completion of required granting actions, the terms cannot be considered to have been determined with finality until (and unless) such actions were completed.

backdating and spring loading stock options-65

Palm springs adult webcam

Indeed, as evidenced by some of the option granting practices and patterns of conduct that the staff has become aware of, awarding options in a manner that did not comply with the required granting actions does suggest that the terms and recipients of the options may have been subject to change.As with all staff guidance, this letter has not been approved by the Commission.